This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Bioinformatics, genomics, tools and databases (29) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2521) Infectious Diseases (non-STD/STI) (1683) Immunoinformatics and Pathology informatics (15) Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (24)

Published on in Vol 6 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/72133, first published .
In Silico Analysis and Validation of A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease (ADAM) 17 Gene Missense Variants: Structural Bioinformatics Study

In Silico Analysis and Validation of A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease (ADAM) 17 Gene Missense Variants: Structural Bioinformatics Study

In Silico Analysis and Validation of A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease (ADAM) 17 Gene Missense Variants: Structural Bioinformatics Study

Authors of this article:

Abdelilah Mechnine1 Author Orcid Image ;   Asmae Saih2 Author Orcid Image ;   Lahcen Wakrim3 Author Orcid Image ;   Ahmed Aarab1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    1Biotechnology and Biomolecule Engineering Research Team, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Ancienne Route de l'Aéroport, Km 10, Ziaten. BP:416, Tangier, Morocco

    2Laboratory of Biology and Health, URAC 34, Faculty of Sciences Ben M'Sik, University of Hassan II Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco

    3Virology Unit, Immunovirology Laboratory, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco

    Corresponding Author:

    Abdelilah Mechnine, PhD


    Background: The protein A disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM) domain containing 17, also called tumor necrosis factor alpha–converting enzyme, is mainly responsible for cleaving a specific sequence Pro-Leu-Ala-Gln-Ala-/-Val-Arg-Ser-Ser-Ser in the membrane-bound precursor of tumor necrosis factor alpha. This cleavage process has significant implications for inflammatory and immune responses, and recent research indicates that genetic variants of ADAM17 may influence susceptibility to and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    Objective: The aim of the study is to identify the most deleterious missense variants of ADAM17 that impact protein stability, structure, and function and to assess specific variants potentially involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    Methods: A bioinformatics approach was used on 12,042 single-nucleotide polymorphisms using tools including SIFT (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant), PolyPhen2.0, PROVEAN (Protein Variation Effect Analyzer), PANTHER (Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships), SNP&GO (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Gene Ontology), PhD-SNP (Predictor of Human Deleterious Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms), Mutation Assessor, SNAP2 (Screening for Non-Acceptable Polymorphisms 2), MUpro, I-Mutant, iStable, InterPro, Sparks-x, PROCHECK (Programs to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures), PyMol, Project HOPE (Have (y)Our Protein Explained), ConSurf, and SWISS-MODEL. Missense variants of ADAM17 were collected from the Ensembl database for analysis.

    Results: In total, 7 nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E) were identified as high-risk pathogenic by all prediction tools, and these variants were found to potentially have deleterious effects on the stability, structure, and function of the ADAM17 protein, potentially destroying the entire cleavage process. Additionally, 4 missense variants (Q658H, D657G, D654N, and F652L) in positions related to SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibited high conservation scores and were predicted to be deleterious, suggesting that they play an important role in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    Conclusions: Specific missense variants of ADAM17 are predicted to be highly pathogenic, potentially affecting protein stability and function and contributing to SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. These findings provide a basis for understanding their clinical relevance, aiding in early diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapeutic development.

    JMIR Bioinform Biotech 2025;6:e72133

    doi:10.2196/72133

    Keywords

    bioinformatics; in silico; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; molecular modeling 


    The ADAM family, which stands for A disintegrin and metalloprotease, is made up of both single-passage transmembrane proteins and secreted metalloendopeptidases. These enzymes share a distinct domain structure, which includes a prodomain, metalloprotease domain, disintegrin domain, cysteine-rich region, epidermal growth factor–like domain, a transmembrane segment, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic tail [1,2].

    However, some human ADAM proteins lack a functional protease domain, meaning that many of ADAMs’ roles are centered on protein-protein interactions rather than protease activity. ADAM proteins belong to the EC 3.4.24.46 enzyme classification and are part of the MEROPS M12B peptidase family. For instance, active ADAM proteases are often referred to as sheddases because they cleave or remove extracellular parts of transmembrane proteins, such as ADAM10, and are able to cleave part of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, which then activates the receptor. ADAM genes are present in choanoflagellates, animals, fungi, and certain green algae, while these proteins are not present in most green algae and all land plants because they probably lost it. ADAM proteins have been historically referred to by names like adamalysin or MDC (metalloproteinase type, disintegrin type, cysteine-rich) family [3-6].

    ADAM17 is a polypeptide of 824 amino acids, 93,021 Da, and it is located on chromosome 2p25. ADAM17 is hugely expressed in a lot of tissues, such as the brain, kidney, heart, and voluntary muscle, and its expression changes during embryonic development and adult life. ADAM17 is a multidomain protein composed of several conserved domains, starting with an N-terminal signal peptide spanning amino acids (aa 1‐17), followed by a prodomain (aa 18‐216), in which there is a cysteine switch-like region PKVCGY186 (aa 181‐188), a metalloenzyme or catalytic domain (aa 217‐474) with a Zn-binding domain region (aa 405‐417), a disintegrin cysteine-rich domain (aa 480‐559), an epidermal growth factor–like region (aa 571‐602), followed by a cysteine-rich domain (aa 603‐671), and a transmembrane domain (aa 672‐694), end by a cytoplasmic tail (aa 695‐824). Tyr702, Thr735, and Ser819 have been shown as cytoplasmic phosphorylation sites, and Ser791 has been shown as a cytoplasmic dephosphorylation site. ADAM17 has little or no sequence similarities with other ADAMs, its closest relative is ADAM10; however, their protein sequence homology is a smaller amount than 30% consistent with the National Center for Biotechnology Information Basic Local Alignment Search Tool [7,8].

    The purpose of ADAM17 is to treat tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) both inside the trans-Golgi network’s internal membranes and on the cell’s surface. The cleavage and release of a soluble ectodomain from membrane-bound proproteins (such as pro-TNF-α) involve this process, which is also known as “excretion” and is recognized to have physiological significance. The first “sheddase” to be discovered, ADAM17, is also thought to be involved in the release of a wide range of membrane-anchored cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, receptors, ligands, and enzymes [9,10].

    The 26-kDa type II transmembrane propolypeptide that the TNF-α gene encodes inserts into the cell membrane during maturation, according to the gene’s cloning. Pro-TNF-α is physiologically active on the cell surface and can trigger immunological responses by means of juxtacrine intercellular communication. The Ala76-Val77 amide bond of pro-TNF-α, however, is susceptible to proteolytic breakage, which liberates the molecule’s soluble 17-kDa extracellular domain (ectodomain). The cytokine known as TNF-α, which is of vital importance in paracrine signaling, is the soluble ectodomain. ADAM17 catalyzes the proteolytic release of soluble TNF-α [11].

    ADAM17 has recently been identified as a key modulator of radiation therapy resistance. Radiation treatment may induce furin-mediated cleavage of the inactive form of ADAM17, converting it into its active form in a dose-dependent manner. This results in increased ADAM17 activity both in vitro and in vivo. In nonsmall cell lung cancer, radiation therapy has also been demonstrated to activate ADAM17, which leads to the excretion of several survival factors, the activation of the growth factor pathway, and the development of radiation resistance [12].

    In addition, ADAM17 might be a key player in the Notch signaling pathway when the intracellular Notch domain (from the Notch1 receptor) is released proteolytically following ligand interaction. By controlling the mammary gland’s excretion of the epidermal growth factor receptor, amphiregulin ligand, ADAM17 also controls the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Additionally, ADAM17 contributes to the excretion of the cell adhesion protein, L-selectin. To investigate the structural and functional effects of the chosen missense variations of the ADAM17 protein, we used a variety of bioinformatic techniques in the current methodology [13,14].

    The primary cellular receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 to infect cells is the enzyme angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). This receptor is recognized by the S protein of SARS-CoV-2, which facilitates the key process of viral entry into a target cell. ADAM17 directly interacts with ACE2, leading to the shedding of ACE2 into the extracellular space, while transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) not only cleaves ACE2 but also cleaves the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, facilitating membrane fusion and cellular uptake of the virus.

    Both ADAM17 and TMPRSS2 act on ACE2, although these proteases can have opposite effects on the loss of ACE2. When the respective proteolytic activities of ADAM17 and TMPRSS2 result in increased shedding of ACE2, this situation may act as a natural barrier to infection. This could be due to the interaction of soluble ACE2 with the virus, preventing it from binding to susceptible tissues [15-21].

    Alongside our work on ADAM17 variants and SARS-CoV-2 infection, Cho et al [22] explored in detail the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in different patients and highlighted immune response variation in terms of COVID-19 host factors. Additionally, Abbas et al [23] have used machine learning to profile RNA 5-methylcytosine modifications, a computational approach that is similarly conceptually related to how we have applied predictive methods in our analysis of ADAM17 variants [23].

    This study highlights the potential of bioinformatics-driven variant analysis in exploring high-risk ADAM17 mutations, shedding light on their possible role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and advancing our understanding of ADAM17’s impact on immune and inflammatory processes.


    Overview

    We collected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the ADAM17 gene data from the Ensembl database [24]. Only missense variants were extracted from the total SNPs for the first study, and only 7 missense variants were selected and tested for further bioinformatic approaches. For the second study, only variants related to SARS-CoV-2, located between positions 652 and 658, were extracted. In total, 4 missense variants were selected and tested using bioinformatics approaches. The amino acid sequence in FASTA (FAST-All) format was retrieved from the UniProt database [25-27].

    Ethical Considerations

    This study involved only in silico analyses based on publicly available genomic data retrieved from the Ensembl genome database [24]. The data used are fully anonymized and do not contain any personally identifiable information or involve human or animal subjects. Thus, no ethics approval was required.

    Prediction of Deleterious Nonsynonymous SNPs Using SIFT, PolyPhen, PROVEAN, SNAP2, Mutation Assessor, PANTHER, SNP&GO, and PhD-SNP

    We used 5 bioinformatic servers for the first study, namely, SIFT (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant), PolyPhen, PROVEAN (Protein Variation Effect Analyzer), SNAP2 (Screening for Non-Acceptable Polymorphisms 2), and Mutation Assessor. SIFT (version 6.0), a web-based server, was used to predict the impact of a substitution on protein function. A SIFT score >0.05 indicates a tolerated or neutral mutation, while a score <0.05 indicates a deleterious or damaging mutation. PolyPhen-2 (version 2.2) is a web server that predicts the impact of mutations on protein structure and function. It was used to classify mutations into probably damaging, possibly damaging, and neutral. PROVEAN (version 1.1) is a web-based tool that analyzes the functional impact of protein mutations. When the score >2.5, the mutation is considered as neutral and has no effect on the protein. When the score is <2.5, the mutation is considered as deleterious and consequently has a deleterious effect on the protein. SNAP2 is a web-based server that is used to predict the functional effect of a mutation. Based on a neural network method, SNAP2 predicts the changes due to a nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism (nsSNP) on the secondary structure and compares the solvent accessibility of the native and mutated protein to distinguish them into effect (+100, strongly predicted) or neutral (−100, strongly predicted). Mutation Assessor is a web-based tool that is used to predict the functional effect of a mutation on a protein based on an evolutionary conservation approach. We used 5 bioinformatic servers for the second study, namely, SIFT, PolyPhen, PANTHER (Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships), SNP&GO (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Gene Ontology), and PhD-SNP (Predictor of Human Deleterious Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). PANTHER is a web-based tool for predicting nonsynonymous genetic variants that may play a causal role in human disease. PANTHER includes the Position-Specific Evolutionary Preservation tool, which predicts deleterious or pathogenic variants based on evolutionary conservation across homologous proteins from various organisms. The reference protein sequence of humans as well as sequences from 100 other species is used for these predictions. SNP&GO is a web-based tool using support vector machine (SVM) methods to predict whether a mutation is disease-related based on the protein sequence. The protein sequence is formatted in FASTA, and results are categorized as either neutral or disease-related, with a reliability index greater than 5 indicating a disease-causing mutation. PhD-SNP is also based on SVM and predicts whether a point mutation is a neutral polymorphism or associated with genetic disorders. It uses unique information derived from protein sequence, phylogenetic relationships, and the protein’s encoded function to determine whether the variant is disease-associated. This part was inspired by a study by Saih et al [28], who used SIFT, PolyPhen, and PROVEAN consecutively [29-36].

    Prediction of Mutation Effect on Stability and Structure of ADAM17 Protein Using I-Mutant, MUpro, and iStable

    I-Mutant is a predictor of the effect of a single mutation on protein stability using protein sequences or structures and is an SVM tool based on predicting automatically the stability changes of a protein upon single-point mutations. A delta G>0 indicates a decrease in protein stability, while delta G<0 suggests increased stability. MUpro is a web-based tool used to predict the effect of mutations on the stability (increase or decrease) of a protein. The score >0 means that the mutation results in an increase in the stability of the protein, while a score <0 means that the mutation decreases the stability of the protein. iStable (Integrated predictor for protein stability change upon single mutation) analyzes protein stability using sequence information and predictions from different predictors. In this sequential analysis, 3 predictors are used: I-Mutant2.0, MUpro, and iStable [37-39].

    Conservation and Conserved Domain Analysis Using ConSurf and InterPro

    ConSurf is a web server that is used for estimating the evolutionary conservation of amino or nucleic acid positions in a protein or DNA or RNA molecule based on the phylogenetic relations between homologous sequences and also for identifying functional regions. A conservation score ranging from 1 to 3 is considered variable, 5 to 6 is intermediate, and 7 to 9 indicates high conservation. InterPro is a web-based server that is used to identify the location of nsSNPs on conserved domains. InterPro recognizes protein motifs and domains, enabling functional characterization of the protein using its database of protein families, domains, and functional site [40-43].

    ADAM17 Modeling Using SWISS-MODEL Server and Sparks-X

    SWISS-MODEL is a web server dedicated to protein structure homology modeling at different levels of complexity. 3D protein structures provide valuable insights into their molecular function and inform a broad spectrum of applications in life science research. Modeling of protein structures usually requires extensive expertise in structural biology and the use of highly specialized computer programs for each of the individual steps of the modeling process, and templates selected based on sequence identity and Global Model Quality Estimation score. Sparks-x is a fold-recognition method used to generate 3D protein structures. This tool improves structure prediction through enhanced alignment scoring and the use of SPINE-X, which boosts predictions of secondary structure, backbone torsion angles, and solvent-accessible surfaces [44,45].

    Validation of ADAM17 Models Using PROCHECK

    PROCHECK (Programs to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures) assesses the stereochemical quality of protein structures. It produces PostScript plots analyzing the global and residue-level geometry. PROCHECK-NMR is used to check the quality of structures resolved by nuclear magnetic resonance [46,47].

    Prediction of Mutation Effect on Protein Structure Using Project HOPE Server

    HOPE (Have (y)Our Protein Explained) server is based on the automatic analysis of mutants, which can provide more clarification of the structural and functional effects on it. HOPE is an application that analyzes mutations automatically and explains the molecular source (origin) of a disease caused by it [48].

    Visualization of ADAM17 Native and Mutants Using PyMol

    PyMol (version 2.5) is a molecular visualization program used to generate high-quality 3D images of proteins, as well as to edit molecular structures, perform ray tracing, and create molecular animations. PyMol (version 1.2r3pre; Schrödinger, LLC) is written in Python, one of the most popular programming languages, and can be easily extended through Python-based plugins.

    All computational analyses were performed using default parameters except where otherwise noted. Tools were accessed from March to November 2024.


    Overview

    In the first study, a total of 12,042 SNPs were collected from the Ensembl database. PROVEAN, PolyPhen-2, Mutation Assessor, SNAP2, and SIFT programs were used to predict the functional effects of mutations on ADAM17, while MUpro and I-Mutant tools were used to predict the mutation effects on protein stability. Additionally, SWISS-MODEL, ConSurf, and HOPE project were used to evaluate the mutation effects on protein function, structure, and protein-protein interactions. Ten various bioinformatics programs and tools are used to predict the mutation effects during this analysis, as relying on a single program or server is insufficient for accurately assessing mutation impact on proteins.

    Among all collected SNPs, only those variants related to SARS-CoV-2 (positions 652 to 658) were extracted. Four missense variants were selected and analyzed using bioinformatics approaches.

    Prediction of Deleterious nsSNPs Using SIFT, PolyPhen, PROVEAN, SNAP2, Mutation Assessor, PANTHER, SNP&GO, and PhD-SNP

    Of the initial 12,042 SNPs analyzed to predict deleterious effects on the ADAM17 protein, all were first submitted to SIFT; according to SIFT, 88 of these mutations were predicted to be deleterious (index score from 0 to 0.02). These 88 SNPs were subsequently analyzed with PROVEAN, and the results of PROVEAN showed that 60 SNPs were predicted deleterious. Similarly, when analyzed with PolyPhen, 48 of the SNPs were found to be probably damaging, with scores >0.9.

    Next, the same 88 SNPs were analyzed using SNAP2, which predicted that 75 SNPs would have functional impacts on the ADAM17 protein with a score more than 1. Finally, Mutation Assessor identified 66 SNPs with a medium functional impact. In summary, from all 12,042 SNPs, only 7 mutations, namely, P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E, were predicted to have a high functional impact on the ADAM17 protein by all computational tools (Tables 1 and 2).

    Table 1. Prediction of deleterious nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the ADAM17a gene using SIFTb and PolyPhen.
    Variant IDAmino acid mutationSIFT scoreSIFT classPolyPhen scorePolyPhen class
    rs1394373815P 556 L0Deleterious0.997Probably damaging
    rs542316178G 550 D0Deleterious0.987Probably damaging
    rs777478676V 483 A0Deleterious0.987Probably damaging
    rs951262662G 479 E0Deleterious0.996Probably damaging
    rs1192348585G 349 E0.01Deleterious1Probably damaging
    rs1157021454T 339 P0Deleterious1Probably damaging
    rs768704961D 232 E0Deleterious1Probably damaging

    aADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    bSIFT: Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant.

    Table 2. Prediction of deleterious nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms of ADAM17a gene using PROVEANb, Mutation Assessor, and SNAP2c.
    Variant IDAmino acid mutationPROVEANMutation AssessorSNAP2
    ScorePredictionScorePredictionScorePrediction
    rs1394373815P 556 L−8.978Deleterious4.095High37Effect
    rs542316178G 550 D−6.068Deleterious4.83High76Effect
    rs777478676V 483 A−3.496Deleterious4.215High43Effect
    rs951262662G 479 E−7.119Deleterious4.78High89Effect
    rs1192348585G 349 E−7.269Deleterious3.83High83Effect
    rs1157021454T 339 P−5.606Deleterious3.735High69Effect
    rs768704961D 232 E−3.795Deleterious3.79High84Effect

    aADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    bPROVEAN: Protein Variation Effect Analyzer.

    cSNAP2: Screening for Non-Acceptable Polymorphisms 2.

    For the second study, 4 SARS-CoV-2–related nsSNPs (Q658H, D657G, D654N, and F652L) were submitted to SIFT. According to SIFT, mutations Q658H, D657G, and D654N were predicted to be deleterious (with index scores between 0 and 0.01), and F652L to be tolerated.

    PolyPhen classified all 4 mutations as benign, while PANTHER identified D657G and D654N as likely damaging (score>0.57), and Q658H and F652L as possibly damaging (score~0.5).

    The 4 nsSNPs were submitted to the SNP&GO program, which indicated that these SNPs would not have effects related to human diseases with scores above 0. The same nsSNPs were also analyzed using PhD-SNP, where the results indicated that the mutation D657G might have a pathogenic impact with a score of 3, while the other 3 mutations (Q658H, D654N, and F652L) were predicted to have neutral impacts (Tables 3 and 4).

    Table 3. Prediction of the deleterious effects of nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to SARS-CoV-2 using SIFTa and PolyPhen.
    Variant IDAmino acid mutationSIFT scoreSIFT classPolyPhen scorePolyPhen class
    rs765452935Q658H0.01Deleterious0.003Benign
    rs144657795D657G0Deleterious0.097Benign
    rs758594009D654N0Deleterious0.063Benign
    rs780262610F652L0.81Tolerated0.015Benign

    aSIFT: Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant.

    Table 4. Prediction of the deleterious effects of nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to SARS-CoV-2 using PANTHERa, SNP&GOb, and PhD-SNPc.
    Variant IDAmino acid mutationPANTHERSNP&GOPhD-SNP
    PSEPdPredictionPdelReliability indexPredictionReliability indexPrediction
    rs765452935Q658H220Possibly damaging.506Neutral3Neutral
    rs144657795D657G455Probably damaging.572Neutral3Disease
    rs758594009D654N1036Probably damaging.851Neutral5Neutral
    rs780262610F652L220Possibly damaging.508Neutral6Neutral

    aPANTHER: Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships.

    bSNP&GO: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Gene Ontology.

    cPhD-SNP: Predictor of Human Deleterious Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.

    dPSEP: Position-Specific Evolutionary Preservation.

    Prediction of Mutation Effects on the Protein Energy and Stability Using I-Mutant, MUpro, and iStable Servers

    MUpro results showed that 6 of the 7 selected mutations (G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E) were predicted to decrease the stability of the ADAM17 protein, while the mutation P556L was predicted to increase the stability of the ADAM17 protein. Then, the 7 selected mutations were submitted to I-Mutant. Results of I-Mutant showed that all the 7 mutations (P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E) were predicted to decrease the stability of ADAM17 protein (Table 5).

    Table 5. Prediction of ADAM17a stability using MUpro and I-Mutant tools.
    MutationMUproI-Mutant
    Delta GPredictionDelta GPrediction
    P 556 L0.20231915Increase−0.51Decrease
    G 550 D−0.35202875Decrease−0.76Decrease
    V 483 A−2.5029256Decrease−1.4Decrease
    G 479 E−0.20347724Decrease−0.8Decrease
    G 349 E−0.096611232Decrease−0.48Decrease
    T 339 P−1.4271878Decrease−0.63Decrease
    D 232 E−1.1774927Decrease−0.58Decrease

    aADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    For the second study, iStable was used to predict the stability of these 4 mutations on the ADAM17 protein. The iStable results indicated that these 4 residues (Q658H, D657G, D654N, and F652L) were predicted to decrease the protein’s stability (Table 6).

    Table 6. Stability analysis of ADAM17a mutations related to SARS-CoV-2 using iStable.
    MutationConfidence scorePrediction
    Q658H0.671109Decrease
    D657G0.846768Decrease
    D654N0.799807Decrease
    F652L0.808582Decrease

    aADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    Prediction of Phylogenetic Conservation Using ConSurf and Study of Conserved Domains Using InterPro

    The ConSurf analysis showed that all 7 substitutions are extremely conserved with a conservation score of 9. Six of these mutations (P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, T339P, and D232E) were predicted to be exposed and functional, while the mutation G349E was predicted to be buried and structural. In the second study, ConSurf results showed 3 substitutions (Q658H, D657G, and D654N) to be highly conserved with a score of 8 and were predicted to be exposed and functional, while substitution (F652L) was very conserved with a score of 7 and predicted to be buried. The full visualization of the ConSurf-based phylogenetic conservation analysis of ADAM17 is provided in Multimedia Appendix 1.

    For the second study, the InterPro domains identified include IPR032029, which indicates the ADAM17 proximal membrane domain (580-642), IPR001762, which indicates the disintegrin domain (475-563), IPR034025, which indicates the catalytic domain 17 (223-477) ADAM10/ADAM17, IPR001590 peptidase M12B, and ADAM/reprolysin, and IPR002870, which indicates peptidase M12B propeptide (48-167; Figure 1).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Identification of the ADAM17 protein domain using the InterPro server. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    Total number of residues is 824. In the native ADAM17 structure, 604 (82.9%) of amino acids were in the favorable region, 119 (16.3%) in the allowed region, and 6 (0.8%) in the disallowed region. However, in the mutant structure (eg, Q658H), the percentage of the favorable region decreased, and the disallowed region increased, which can be explained by the fact that the mutation impacts the protein and its modeling. All Ramachandran plot results by PROCHECK are provided in Multimedia Appendices 2-6 (Figure 2 and Table 7).

    ‎
    Figure 2. Ramachandran plot of the native model generated by PROCHECK. PROCHECK: Programs to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures.
    Table 7. Percentage of different regions for each mutation using PROCHECKa.
    MutationFavored region, n (%)Allowed region, n (%)Disallowed region, n (%)
    Native604 (82.9)119 (16.3)6 (0.8)
    Q658H585 (80)129 (17.6)17 (2.3)
    D657G608 (83.3)112 (15.3)10 (1.4)
    D654N600 (82.1)121 (16.6)10 (1.4)
    F652L609 (83.3)108 (14.8)14 (1.9)

    aPROCHECK: Programs to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures.

    Modeling of ADAM17 Using SWISS-MODEL and Sparks-X

    In this study, we used the SWISS-MODEL server to construct the 3D structure of the native and 7 mutants of the ADAM17 protein. We used 2dw0.1. A (crystal structure of vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein 2 from Crotalus Atrox venom [Form 2‐1 crystal]) as a template with a sequence identity equal to 35.21% and resolution of 2.15 A°. In the second study, the Sparks-X server was used to generate the 3D structure of both native and the 4 mutants of ADAM17 molecules.

    Visualization of ADAM17 Mutations Using the PyMol Program

    The 3D structures of the ADAM17 native and mutant models were visualized using PyMol. Structural similarities and differences between the ADAM17 native and its mutants are shown in Figures 3 and 4.

    ‎
    Figure 3. Visualization of ADAM17 native and mutations using the PyMol program. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.
    ‎
    Figure 4. Visualization of ADAM17 native and mutations related to SARS-CoV-2 using the PyMol program. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    Prediction of Structural Effects of Mutations in ADAM17 Using the HOPE Server

    rs1394373815

    The sizes are different between the amino acids of wild-type and mutant. The mutant residue is larger than the wild-type residue, and this might lead to bumps. Prolines are known to have a very rigid structure, sometimes forcing the backbone in a specific conformation. Possibly, the mutation changes a proline with such a function into another residue, thereby disturbing the local structure. The residue is found on the surface of the protein.

    rs542316178

    The charge of the mutant amino acid differs from that of the wild-type. The mutation introduces a charge, and this can cause repulsion of ligands or other residues with the same charge. The sizes are different between the amino acids of wild-type and mutant. The mutant residue is larger, and this might lead to bumps. The torsion angles for this residue are unusual. Only glycine is flexible enough to make these torsion angles, and mutation into another residue will force the local backbone into an incorrect conformation and will disturb the local structure.

    rs777478676

    The sizes are different between the amino acids of wild-type and mutant. The mutant residue is smaller, and this might lead to loss of interactions. The mutant residue is situated close to a position that is highly conserved. The mutation introduces an amino acid with different properties, which can disturb this domain and abolish its function.

    rs951262662

    The mutant amino acid carries a charge that differs from the wild-type counterpart. Because the mutation adds a charge, it can repel ligands or residues with similar charges. The sizes of the amino acids in the mutant and wild-type also differ, with the mutant residue being bulkier, which may result in steric hindrance. The torsion angles for this residue are unusual; glycine is the only amino acid flexible enough to adopt these angles. Mutation to a different residue will force the local backbone into an improper conformation and disturb the surrounding structure.

    rs1192348585

    The charge of the mutant amino acid contrasts with that of the wild-type. This mutation introduces a charge that may cause repulsive interactions with ligands or other residues carrying the same charge. Size differences between the mutant and wild-type amino acids are notable, as the mutant residue is larger and could cause clashes. The torsion angles for this residue are uncommon; glycine alone has the necessary flexibility to maintain such angles. Mutating to any other residue will impose strain on the local backbone, leading to an incorrect conformation and disruption of the local structural environment.

    rs1157021454

    The wild-type and mutant residues have different levels of hydrophobicity. At this location, the mutation adds a more hydrophobic residue. This may cause hydrogen bonds to break or disturb the proper. The wild-type residue and the mutant residue share certain properties. This mutation might occur in some rare cases, but it is more likely that the mutation is damaging to the protein.

    rs768704961

    The sizes are different between the amino acids of wild-type and mutant. The mutant residue is larger, and this might lead to bumps. The mutation is located within a domain and annotated in UniProt as peptidase M12B. Only this residue type was found at this position. Mutation of a 100% conserved residue is usually damaging for the protein.


    Principal Findings

    In this study, different tools were used to identify the most deleterious nsSNPs of the ADAM17 protein, namely, SIFT, PolyPhen, PROVEAN, SNAP2, Mutation Assessor, I-Mutant, MUpro, and ConSurf; these tools were selected according to the following steps: pathogenicity study, stability, and conservation study. Parameters like accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were chosen to assess their predictive abilities. Without these parameters, it will not be possible to completely evaluate the accuracy of a test.

    In this bioinformatic study, we identified 7 nsSNPs (P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E) from the entire residues of ADAM17. These nsSNPs were predicted by 5 tools: SIFT score of all these mutations ≈0 and classed as deleterious effect on the protein, PolyPhen score≈1 and classed in the probably damaging class, PROVEAN score of all of these mutations is negative (<−3.4) and was predicted deleterious, Mutation Assessor score of all of these mutations is positive (>3.7) and predicted to have a high functional impact on the protein, and SNAP2 score results were positive (>42) and classed to have a functional effect on the protein. In addition, we also evaluated protein stability using I-Mutant and MUpro. I-Mutant predicted that all 7 mutations would decrease the protein stability. MUpro results agreed for most mutations, except that the P556L mutation was predicted to increase the stability. Maximum conservation score by ConSurf means that all mutations were predicted to have functional effects, except the G349E mutation, which was predicted to have a structural effect on ADAM17.

    These mutations (P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E; rs1394373815, rs542316178, rs777478676, rs951262662, rs1192348585, rs1157021454, and rs768704961) are novel for their impact on ADAM17 structure, function, and stability.

    The second part of this study focuses on nsSNPs that may be directly related to SARS-CoV-2 due to their positions within the ADAM17 protein. We analyzed 4 nsSNPs of interest (Q658H, D657G, D654N, and F652L), which were found to have the highest conservation scores and were predicted to be deleterious and reducing the stability of ADAM17. We hypothesized that these residues (Q658, D657, D654, and F652) are actively involved in the cleavage of ACE2 by ADAM17, and a mutation at any of these positions could disrupt the entire cleavage process. To support this hypothesis, we used a series of tools to assess the pathogenicity of these mutants.

    Comparison to Prior Studies

    More than 80 distinct substrates have been discovered to be processed by ADAM17, also referred to as TNFα-converting enzyme, since its discovery. ADAM17, like most other ADAM relations, is understood to process single-spanning membrane proteins like growth factors, cytokines, receptors, chemokines, and regulators of neurological processes and diseases, and ADAM17 processes more than 80 substrates, and lots of them are linked to inflammatory and cancerous diseases. More recently, molecules important to tumor immunosurveillance have been found to be substrates for ADAM17, and research on the shedding events that this enzyme orchestrates has produced new theories of resistance to common cancer treatments. While ADAM17 features a wide range of substrate profiles, it typically only becomes active in response to triggers that cause disease states, making it a good target for a treatment approach.

    The study by Pavlenko et al [49] has demonstrated that there are important ADAM17 residues, namely, R177C, D616N, D657A, and R725H, that play important roles in different cancer types. The R177C mutation affects the prodomain of ADAM17 and causes cecum and central nervous system cancer, the D616N affects the membrane-proximal domain and causes cancer in colon and uterus, the D657A residue affects the membrane-proximal domain and causes colon cancer, and R725H residue affects the cytoplasmic domain and causes colon cancer [49].

    Mutations in the ADAM17 gene have been associated with neonatal inflammatory skin and bowel disease, a condition characterized by inflammatory features with neonatal onset, affecting the skin, hair, and gastrointestinal tract. The skin lesions involve perioral and perianal erythema, psoriasiform erythroderma, with flares of erythema, scaling, and widespread pustules. Gastrointestinal symptoms include malabsorptive diarrhea that is exacerbated by intercurrent gastrointestinal infections. The hair is brief or broken; therefore, the eyelashes and eyebrows are wiry and disorganized. The results of this study may be applicable for the analysis of novel missense variants of the ADAM17 gene.

    Several studies have demonstrated that residues located between positions 652 and 659 catalyze the shedding of the ACE2 ectodomain by ADAM17 [50,51]. Recent advances in deep learning, such as self-supervised learning, provide promising avenues for enhancing the predictive capabilities of bioinformatics tools like the ones implemented in this work. In addition, application of federated learning with its privacy-preserving analytics approach applied to Internet of Things in smart health care could increase the scope for computational approaches such as that done for the ADAM17 variant [52,53].

    Limitations

    Our study has several limitations. First, it is based entirely on computational analysis using predictive tools and servers, which may have many varying confidence levels and potential false positive rates that we did not fully address. In addition, the structural analysis using PyMol revealed visual differences between native and mutant proteins, but their functional implications of these structural changes are not thoroughly explored or explained. Second, the 7 deleterious variants and the 4 variants that have a relation with SARS-CoV-2 infection should be confirmed with future laboratory experiments and clinical wet laboratory approaches to figure out the mechanism of these mutations.

    Conclusions

    In this in silico study of the high-risk missense variants of ADAM17, we identified 7 nsSNPs (P556L, G550D, V483A, G479E, G349E, T339P, and D232E) as the most deleterious mutations in the ADAM17 gene. All 7 mutations were predicted to have damaging effects on the structure, function, and stability of the ADAM17 protein. This study represents the first in silico analysis that evaluates the effect of these missense variants on the function and structure of ADAM17, and these results still require validation with in vitro experiments.

    To support this study, in vitro experiments should be conducted to confirm the in silico results. For future research, our results confirm the impact of the 4 named mutations (Q658H, D657G, D654N, and F652L) on the pathology related to SARS-CoV-2, which strongly reinforces the role of ADAM17 in the ectodomain shedding process of ACE2.

    Our findings form a basis for understanding the potential implications of ADAM17 variants on disease, which may lead to earlier diagnosis, assessment of risk for progression of related diseases, and may help inform future therapeutic targeting.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are thankful to the Pasteur Institute of Morocco for providing encouragement and facilities.

    Data Availability

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published paper and Multimedia Appendices 1-6.

    Authors' Contributions

    AM conceptualized and led the study, conducted data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. AS, LW, and AA contributed to data collection, interpretation, and manuscript review.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    ConSurf results.

    PDF File, 56 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Ramachandran for ADAM17 wild. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    PDF File, 17 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 3

    Ramachandran ADAM17 mutation D654N. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    PDF File, 17 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 4

    Ramachandran ADAM17 mutation D657G. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    PDF File, 17 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 5

    Ramachandran ADAM17 mutation F652L. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    PDF File, 17 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 6

    Ramachandran ADAM17 mutation Q658H. ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease.

    PDF File, 17 KB
    1. Zhong S, Khalil RA. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) and ADAM with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) family in vascular biology and disease. Biochem Pharmacol. Jun 2019;164:188-204. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Giebeler N, Zigrino P. A disintegrin and metalloprotease (ADAM): historical overview of their functions. Toxins (Basel). Apr 23, 2016;8(4):122. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Edwards DR, Handsley MM, Pennington CJ. The ADAM metalloproteinases. Mol Aspects Med. Oct 2008;29(5):258-289. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Liu PCC, Liu X, Li Y, et al. Identification of ADAM10 as a major source of HER2 ectodomain sheddase activity in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. Jun 2006;5(6):657-664. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Souza JSM, Lisboa ABP, Santos TM, et al. The evolution of ADAM gene family in eukaryotes. Genomics. Sep 2020;112(5):3108-3116. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Blobel CP. Metalloprotease-disintegrins: links to cell adhesion and cleavage of TNF alpha and Notch. Cell. Aug 22, 1997;90(4):589-592. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Gooz M. ADAM-17: the enzyme that does it all. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. Apr 2010;45(2):146-169. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Xu J, Mukerjee S, Silva-Alves CRA, et al. A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. Front Physiol. 2016;7:469. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Peiretti F, Canault M, Morange P, Alessi MC, Nalbone G. The two sides of ADAM17 in inflammation: implications in atherosclerosis and obesity. Med Sci (Paris). Jan 2009;25(1):45-50. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Canault M, Leroyer AS, Peiretti F, et al. Microparticles of human atherosclerotic plaques enhance the shedding of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme/ADAM17 substrates, tumor necrosis factor and tumor necrosis factor receptor-1. Am J Pathol. Nov 2007;171(5):1713-1723. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Moss ML, Jin SL, Milla ME, et al. Cloning of a disintegrin metalloproteinase that processes precursor tumour-necrosis factor-alpha. Nature New Biol. Feb 20, 1997;385(6618):733-736. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Sharma A, Bender S, Zimmermann M, Riesterer O, Broggini-Tenzer A, Pruschy MN. Secretome signature identifies ADAM17 as novel target for radiosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. Sep 1, 2016;22(17):4428-4439. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Sternlicht MD, Sunnarborg SW, Kouros-Mehr H, Yu Y, Lee DC, Werb Z. Mammary ductal morphogenesis requires paracrine activation of stromal EGFR via ADAM17-dependent shedding of epithelial amphiregulin. Development. Sep 2005;132(17):3923-3933. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Li Y, Brazzell J, Herrera A, Walcheck B. ADAM17 deficiency by mature neutrophils has differential effects on L-selectin shedding. Blood. Oct 1, 2006;108(7):2275-2279. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. Apr 16, 2020;181(2):271-280. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Heurich A, Hofmann-Winkler H, Gierer S, Liepold T, Jahn O, Pöhlmann S. TMPRSS2 and ADAM17 cleave ACE2 differentially and only proteolysis by TMPRSS2 augments entry driven by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J Virol. Jan 2014;88(2):1293-1307. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Lambert DW, Yarski M, Warner FJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha convertase (ADAM17) mediates regulated ectodomain shedding of the severe-acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2). J Biol Chem. Aug 26, 2005;280(34):30113-30119. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Monteil V, Kwon H, Prado P, et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell. May 14, 2020;181(4):905-913. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Khan JY, Khondaker MTI, Hoque IT, et al. Toward preparing a knowledge base to explore potential drugs and biomedical entities related to COVID-19: automated computational approach. JMIR Med Inform. Nov 10, 2020;8(11):e21648. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Markovič R, Ternar L, Trstenjak T, Marhl M, Grubelnik V. Cardiovascular comorbidities in COVID-19: comprehensive analysis of key topics. Interact J Med Res. Jul 24, 2024;13:e55699. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Lami F, Elfadul M, Rashak H, et al. Risk factors of COVID-19 critical outcomes in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: multicountry retrospective study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. Mar 15, 2022;8(3):e32831. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Cho K, Park S, Kim EY, et al. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with diverse health conditions: a comprehensive systematic review. J Med Virol. Sep 2022;94(9):4144-4155. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Abbas Z, Rehman MU, Tayara H, Lee SW, Chong KT. m5C-Seq: machine learning-enhanced profiling of RNA 5-methylcytosine modifications. Comput Biol Med. Nov 2024;182:109087. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. ADAM17 gene (ENSG00000151694)—variation table. Ensembl. URL: https:/​/www.​ensembl.org/​Homo_sapiens/​Gene/​Variation_Gene/​Table?db=core;g=ENSG00000151694;r=2:9488486-9556732 [Accessed 2025-08-13]
    25. ADAM17—disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 17 (P78536)—FASTA sequence. The UniProt Consortium. URL: https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P78536.fasta [Accessed 2025-08-18]
    26. Howe KL, Achuthan P, Allen J, et al. Ensembl 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan 8, 2021;49(D1):D884-D891. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Bateman A, Martin MJ, Orchard S, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan 8, 2021;49(D1):D480-D489. [CrossRef]
    28. Saih A, Baba H, Bouqdayr M, et al. In Silico analysis of high-risk missense variants in human ACE2 gene and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6685840. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Sim NL, Kumar P, Hu J, Henikoff S, Schneider G, Ng PC. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 2012;40:W452-W457. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. Apr 2010;7(4):248-249. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Choi Y, Chan AP. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics. Aug 15, 2015;31(16):2745-2747. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Hecht M, Bromberg Y, Rost B. Better prediction of functional effects for sequence variants. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(Suppl 8):S1. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Reva B, Antipin Y, Sander C. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep 1, 2011;39(17):e118. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. Sep 2003;13(9):2129-2141. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Altman RB, Casadio R. WS-SNPs&GO: a web server for predicting the deleterious effect of human protein variants using functional annotation. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(Suppl 3):S6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Capriotti E, Fariselli P. PhD-SNPg: a webserver and lightweight tool for scoring single nucleotide variants. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 3, 2017;45(W1):W247-W252. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Cheng J, Randall A, Baldi P. Prediction of protein stability changes for single-site mutations using support vector machines. Proteins. Mar 1, 2006;62(4):1125-1132. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R. I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 1, 2005;33:W306-W310. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Chen CW, Lin J, Chu YW. iStable: off-the-shelf predictor integration for predicting protein stability changes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14(Suppl 2):S5. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 8, 2016;44(W1):W344-W350. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Celniker G, Nimrod G, Ashkenazy H, et al. ConSurf: using evolutionary data to raise testable hypotheses about protein function. Isr J Chem. Apr 2013;53(3-4):199-206. [CrossRef]
    42. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 2010;38:W529-W533. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan 2009;37:D211-D215. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 2, 2018;46(W1):W296-W303. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Yang Y, Faraggi E, Zhao H, Zhou Y. Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates. Bioinformatics. Aug 1, 2011;27(15):2076-2082. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr. Apr 1, 1993;26(2):283-291. [CrossRef]
    47. Laskowski RA, Rullmannn JA, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR. Dec 1996;8(4):477-486. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Venselaar H, Te Beek TAH, Kuipers RKP, Hekkelman ML, Vriend G. Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov 8, 2010;11:548. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Pavlenko E, Cabron AS, Arnold P, Dobert JP, Rose-John S, Zunke F. Functional characterization of colon cancer-associated mutations in ADAM17: modifications in the pro-domain interfere with trafficking and maturation. Int J Mol Sci. May 4, 2019;20(9):2198. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Sun P, Lu X, Xu C, Wang Y, Sun W, Xi J. CD-sACE2 inclusion compounds: an effective treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Med Virol. Oct 2020;92(10):1721-1723. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Chaudhary M. COVID-19 susceptibility: potential of ACE2 polymorphisms. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2020;21(1):54. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Abdulrazzaq MM, Ramaha NTA, Hameed AA, et al. Consequential advancements of self-supervised learning (SSL) in deep learning contexts. Mathematics. Mar 3, 2024;12(5):758. [CrossRef]
    53. Abbas SR, Abbas Z, Zahir A, Lee SW. Federated learning in smart healthcare: a comprehensive review on privacy, security, and predictive analytics with IoT integration. Healthcare (Basel). Dec 22, 2024;12(24):2587. [CrossRef]

    ‎
    ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
    ADAM: A disintegrin and metalloprotease domain
    HOPE: Have (y)Our Protein Explained
    nsSNP: nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism
    PANTHER: Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships
    PhD-SNP: Predictor of Human Deleterious Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
    PROCHECK: Programs to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures
    PROVEAN: Protein Variation Effect Analyzer
    SIFT: Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant
    SNAP2: Screening for Non-Acceptable Polymorphisms 2
    SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism
    SNP&GO: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Gene Ontology
    SVM: support vector machine
    TMPRSS2: transmembrane protease, serine 2
    TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha

    Edited by Zongliang Yue; submitted 04.02.25; peer-reviewed by Arian Afzalian, Seung Won Lee; final revised version received 29.06.25; accepted 04.07.25; published 25.08.25.

    Copyright

    © Abdelilah Mechnine, Asmae Saih, Lahcen Wakrim, Ahmed Aarab. Originally published in JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology (https://bioinform.jmir.org), 25.8.2025.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://bioinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.